Debate Writing Class 11 | Format, Samples & Skills – PlanetSpark

Debate writing is a key skill taught in Class 11 under the CBSE curriculum. It helps students build critical thinking, speaking, and writing abilities. But reading theory isn't enough. Students need real practice and expert guidance to truly excel.

This article contains

A) Sample Debates: Access well-crafted examples for both sides of motions

B) Structured Format: Learn the essential components of a debate

C) Trending Topics: Engage with current and relevant issues

Want to make your child a confident, sharp, and articulate debater?

Join PlanetSpark’s online debate classes

👉 Book your free trial class today and take the first step toward becoming a debate champion!

What is Debate Writing?

Debate writing is a formal way to share arguments for or against a topic. In schools, it trains students to express their views clearly, refute others with logic, and back ideas with facts.

For Class 11 students, learning this skill boosts not only marks but also communication skills they’ll need in college and life.

Debate Writing Format for Class 11 (CBSE)

A debate should follow a clear format. CBSE recommends this structure:

• Formal Address – “Respected chairperson, judges, and my dear friends…”

• Introduction of the Motion – Clearly state your side.

• Main Arguments – Share 2–3 strong points with examples.

• Counterarguments – Disprove the other side’s points.

• Conclusion – End with a bold summary of your view.

• Word Limit – Keep it around 150–200 words.

📝 Tip: Be logical, objective, and use persuasive language.

Sample Debate Topics for Class 11 Students

Try these hot and relevant topics in your debate practice:

• Should social media be banned for teenagers?

Online learning vs classroom learning

• Is homework still needed today?

• Should school uniforms be compulsory?

• Should voting start at age 16?

• Is AI a threat to human jobs?

• Should sports be a must in school?

• Do exams reflect true learning?

• Can money really buy happiness?

• Should handwriting be graded?
• Should mobile phones be allowed in school?
• Is climate change the biggest threat to humanity?
• Should students be allowed to choose their own subjects?
• Does technology make people less social?
• Should junk food be banned in school canteens?
• Are marks more important than skills?
• Should animal testing be banned?
• Is online privacy a myth?
• Should there be a ban on plastic bags?
• Can books be replaced by digital devices completely?

Choosing timely topics helps students think deeper and argue better.

Skills You Need for Debate Writing

To write a strong debate, you need these skills:

1. Critical Thinking

Look at both sides of the topic. Know the pros and cons.

2. Logical Reasoning

Use points that make sense. Support them with facts.

3. Public Speaking

Speak with confidence and clear body language. This helps even if you're only writing.

4. Research Skills

Add real facts, data, or stories to make your case stronger.

5. Good Language

Use correct grammar and strong vocabulary to be convincing.

🌟 PlanetSpark helps students grow all these skills with fun sessions, real-time debates, and expert feedback.

Samples of Debate Writing for Class 11

Debate Topic 1: “Social Media Should Be Banned for Teenagers”

✅For the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you today to firmly support the motion that social media should be banned for teenagers.

Body:

Teenagers are at a highly impressionable stage in their lives. Social media platforms, though designed for connectivity, often expose them to harmful content, unrealistic standards, and unnecessary peer pressure.

The constant urge to check notifications, likes, and comments creates an addiction that deeply affects their sleep, studies, and overall mental health. Cyberbullying, trolling, and toxic beauty standards are just a few of the dangers teenagers face daily online.

Moreover, excessive screen time is replacing valuable real-world activities. Time spent on social media could instead be used for reading, sports, or developing hobbies that actually help in personality development.

Solution:

While some may argue that social media connects people, for teenagers, the risks outweigh the benefits. The best way to protect them is to impose a ban during these crucial years. They should be encouraged to explore the real world before entering the digital one.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, I strongly believe that banning social media for teenagers is a necessary step to safeguard their mental and emotional well-being. Let’s prioritize their health over likes and followers.

Thank you.

❌Against the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand here today to argue against the motion that social media should be banned for teenagers.

Body:

Social media is not inherently harmful, it’s a tool. And like any tool, the impact depends on how it is used. For teenagers, social media can be a powerful space for learning, creativity, and expression. It keeps them informed, connected, and even motivated by educational content and career ideas.

Completely banning social media would not eliminate the problem. In fact, it might push teenagers to access it secretly, which would make them more vulnerable due to lack of guidance and awareness.

Solution:

Instead of banning it, we should educate teenagers on responsible digital usage. Schools and parents must collaborate to teach digital safety, time management, and online etiquette. This empowers them to make wise choices rather than fear or misuse the platform.

Conclusion:

To conclude, banning is not the answer. Guidance is. Social media, when used smartly, can be a valuable part of a teenager’s growth. Let’s not shut the door let’s open it with responsibility.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 2: “Artificial Intelligence Should Be Regulated to Prevent Bias and Job Displacement”

✅For the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I am here to speak in favor of the motion that Artificial Intelligence should be regulated to prevent bias and job displacement.

Body:

Artificial Intelligence is powerful, but without control, it can be dangerous. Many AI systems show bias because they are trained on unfair or unbalanced data. This has already led to unjust decisions in hiring, law enforcement, and banking.

Moreover, AI is replacing workers at a rapid pace. Many people in manufacturing, customer service, and data processing are losing their jobs to machines. This leads to unemployment and rising inequality.

Solution:

The best way to prevent these problems is to create strong rules. Governments should ensure AI systems are fair, transparent, and regularly reviewed. Workers should also receive training to prepare for new jobs that AI cannot replace.

Conclusion:

To conclude, if we want AI to serve society and not harm it, then regulation is necessary. It will protect both fairness and human employment.

Thank you.

❌Against the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to speak against the motion that Artificial Intelligence should be regulated to prevent bias and job displacement.

Body:

AI is still growing, and too many restrictions can slow down innovation. Instead of banning or over-regulating it, we should use it wisely. AI can solve big problems in health, education, and transportation if we allow it to develop freely.

Bias and job loss are not caused by AI alone. These issues are part of broader human and social systems. The problem lies in how we use AI, not in AI itself.

Solution:

Rather than regulation, we need better education and awareness. People who design AI should be trained in ethics and fairness. We also need to support job transitions by updating school and college curriculums.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, putting too many rules on AI can slow progress. The real solution is responsible use, not restrictions.

Thank you.

"At PlanetSpark, we don’t just teach students how to write debates, we empower them to think critically, speak confidently, and stand out in every discussion"

Debate Topic 3: “Climate Change Education Should Be Mandatory in All Schools”

✅ For the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I am here to speak in favor of the motion that climate change education should be mandatory in all schools.

Body:

Climate change is a major global crisis. From floods and droughts to wildfires and rising sea levels, its effects are everywhere. Still, many young people do not fully understand what causes it or how to stop it.

Schools are the best place to teach these facts. If students learn early, they can form better habits and make wiser choices. It also prepares them for future careers in environmental science and sustainable industries.

Solution:

We should include climate education in science, geography, and social studies. Teachers should be trained to explain the issues clearly and inspire students to take action through projects and campaigns.

Conclusion:

To sum up, if we want a safer planet, we must start with education. Making climate change a regular subject in schools is the first step.

Thank you.

❌Against the Motion

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I am here to speak against the motion that climate change education should be mandatory in all schools.

Body:

There is no doubt that climate change is important, but making it a required subject in all schools may not be practical. Many schools already struggle to cover essential subjects due to time and staff shortages.

Also, students today are already under pressure with too many subjects. Forcing another one on them might not create real interest or awareness. Environmental values can be taught through daily activities and not just textbooks.

Solution:

Instead of making it mandatory, we can add short modules or workshops during the year. Schools can host eco-clubs, tree planting days, or awareness drives that teach the same lessons in a more engaging way.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while climate awareness is important, we should not burden students with more compulsory subjects. We can teach them in creative and flexible ways instead.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 4: Are Marks More Important Than Skills?

✅For the Motion (Marks are More Important than Skills)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to speak in favor of the motion that marks are more important than skills in today’s world.

Body:

In most academic and professional settings, marks act as the first filter. Whether it’s college admission, scholarship selection, or job interviews, marks are often the key criteria. They reflect discipline, hard work, and consistency over a period of time.

Also, marks are used to measure performance in a standardized way. This helps institutions and employers compare students fairly. Without marks, it would be difficult to judge who is more suitable for further opportunities.

Solution:

To ensure fair competition, the education system must maintain a clear and consistent method of evaluation. Marks provide that structure. Skills can be developed later, but a strong academic record opens doors.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while skills are important, marks play a bigger role in shaping a student’s future. They are the stepping stone to success in the current system.

Thank you.

❌Against the Motion (Skills are More Important than Marks)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I strongly oppose the motion that marks are more important than skills. In fact, I believe that skills matter far more in real life.

Body:

Marks only show how well someone performs in exams. They do not reflect creativity, communication, teamwork, or problem-solving ability. On the other hand, skills help us succeed in the real world, where marks don’t matter anymore.

For example, a person may score 95% in English, but if they cannot speak confidently or write creatively, those marks are of little use. Skills help us think critically, adapt to change, and solve real-life problems—things marks can never measure.

Solution:

Schools and colleges should focus more on skill-based learning. Internships, projects, and hands-on activities should be promoted along with academics. Marks should be only one part of the overall evaluation, not the main one.

Conclusion:

To conclude, marks may look good on paper, but it is skills that help us succeed in life. We need to shift our focus from numbers to practical ability.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 5: Should School Uniforms Be Compulsory?

✅ For the Motion (School Uniforms Should Be Compulsory)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to speak in favor of the motion that school uniforms should be compulsory.

Body:

Uniforms promote equality among students. When everyone wears the same clothes, there is no pressure to show off expensive brands or fashion trends. This reduces bullying and social division based on appearance.

Uniforms also encourage discipline and a sense of belonging. They remind students that they are part of a learning environment, not a casual social setting. A common dress code brings unity and seriousness to the school atmosphere.

Solution:

To make uniforms more comfortable and inclusive, schools can choose simple, weather-friendly designs. Students can also be given the option of wearing uniforms with minor variations if needed, but the standard rule should remain.

Conclusion:

To conclude, school uniforms help build equality, reduce distractions, and promote discipline. Making them compulsory is a step toward a more focused and respectful learning environment.

Thank you.

❌ Against the Motion (School Uniforms Should Not Be Compulsory)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I rise to speak against the motion that school uniforms should be compulsory.

Body:

Uniforms take away a student’s freedom to express themselves. Clothes are a form of identity, and forcing everyone to dress the same limits creativity and self-confidence.

Also, uniforms can be uncomfortable, especially in different seasons or for students with specific needs. Buying separate uniforms can be costly for some families and may not even fit well with students' personal comfort or culture.

Solution:

Instead of strict uniforms, schools can have a flexible dress code that allows students to dress modestly and appropriately. This will allow room for self-expression while maintaining discipline.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, school is not just about rules; it is also about growing as individuals. Compulsory uniforms limit this growth. Let students dress with responsibility, not restrictions.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 6: “Should Euthanasia Be Legalized?”

✅ For the Motion (Euthanasia Should Be Legalized)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to speak in favor of the motion that euthanasia should be legalized.

Body:

Euthanasia is a compassionate choice for individuals suffering from terminal illnesses or chronic pain. When a person’s quality of life has significantly diminished and they are in unbearable pain, euthanasia allows them to die with dignity and avoid unnecessary suffering.

Legalizing euthanasia would also ensure that it is carried out under strict guidelines, preventing abuse while respecting an individual’s right to choose how they wish to die. In countries where euthanasia is legal, there are rigorous safeguards in place, ensuring the process is done ethically and responsibly.

Solution:

To prevent abuse, euthanasia should only be allowed with a doctor’s recommendation, after a thorough evaluation of the patient's condition. Strict legal frameworks and ethical guidelines must be established to ensure that only individuals with terminal conditions can choose this option.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, euthanasia should be legalized as it provides an option for those in extreme suffering to end their lives on their own terms. It’s an act of compassion and respect for individual autonomy.

Thank you.

❌ Against the Motion (Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I rise to speak against the motion that euthanasia should be legalized.

Body:

Euthanasia presents profound ethical and moral concerns. Legalizing it would open the door for vulnerable individuals—especially the elderly or disabled to be pressured into making the decision to end their lives. Moreover, it could lead to a slippery slope where the value of human life is compromised, and people may choose euthanasia out of fear or desperation, not genuine desire.

Medical professionals are trained to save lives, and it goes against their fundamental ethics to help end life. Rather than legalizing euthanasia, we should focus on improving palliative care and providing better support for those suffering from terminal illnesses.

Solution:

Instead of euthanasia, we should prioritize improving pain management, mental health support, and quality of life for terminally ill patients. This would allow individuals to experience a dignified death without resorting to euthanasia.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while euthanasia may seem like a solution for some, it raises serious ethical issues that could undermine the sanctity of life. We must focus on alternatives that respect life and dignity without crossing moral boundaries.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 7: “Is Online Education Better than Traditional Classroom Education?”

✅ For the Motion (Online Education is Better than Traditional Classroom Education)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to argue in favor of the motion that online education is better than traditional classroom education.

Body:

Online education offers flexibility and accessibility that traditional classroom education cannot match. Students can access courses from anywhere in the world, making education more inclusive and available to people who may not have access to nearby schools or universities.

Moreover, online education allows students to learn at their own pace, with a variety of multimedia resources to enhance learning. The ability to review lectures, participate in interactive forums, and receive immediate feedback from instructors makes learning more personalized and effective.

Solution:

To improve the quality of online education, schools and universities should invest in advanced learning management systems, high-quality course materials, and support networks to help students succeed.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, online education provides unparalleled access, flexibility, and convenience. As technology continues to evolve, online education will become increasingly efficient, making it the future of learning.

Thank you.

❌ Against the Motion (Online Education is Not Better than Traditional Classroom Education)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I rise to speak against the motion that online education is better than traditional classroom education.

Body:

Traditional classroom education offers face-to-face interaction with teachers and peers, fostering a learning environment that is collaborative and socially enriching. It promotes discipline, time management, and personal engagement, which online education cannot fully replicate.

While online education provides flexibility, it can often lead to distractions, procrastination, and a lack of accountability. Additionally, students miss out on the social and emotional development that happens in a classroom setting. The personal connection with teachers and classmates is crucial to building a well-rounded education.

Solution:

Instead of choosing one over the other, we should focus on a hybrid learning model, combining the strengths of both online and traditional education. This would provide the best of both worlds and accommodate different learning preferences.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while online education has its advantages, traditional classroom education provides essential social interaction, structure, and real-time feedback that online platforms cannot replace. Classroom education remains irreplaceable for the holistic development of students.

Thank you.

Debate Topic 8: “Should Celebrities Be Considered Role Models?”

✅ For the Motion (Celebrities Should Be Considered Role Models)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I stand before you to speak in favor of the motion that celebrities should be considered role models.

Body:

Many celebrities inspire millions with their talent, hard work, and social contributions. Athletes promote discipline and fitness, actors highlight social issues through their work, and many public figures actively support charitable causes. Their stories often motivate people to overcome struggles and chase dreams.

In today’s media-driven world, celebrities have platforms that can be used for good. When they speak out on mental health, education, or equality, it creates awareness and positive change.

Solution:

We should encourage celebrities to act responsibly and use their fame to influence others positively. Schools and parents should help students understand which traits to admire and follow.

Conclusion:

To conclude, celebrities, when mindful of their influence, can serve as inspiring role models. Their journeys, struggles, and successes can teach valuable life lessons.

Thank you.

❌ Against the Motion (Celebrities Should Not Be Considered Role Models)

Introduction:

Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends,

I rise to speak against the motion that celebrities should be considered role models.

Body:

Most celebrities live in a world far removed from the realities of everyday life. Their actions are often influenced by fame, money, and media pressure. Many promote unrealistic standards of beauty, success, or lifestyle, which can mislead young minds. Some are involved in controversies or illegal behavior, yet they continue to be admired simply because they’re famous.

Role models should be people with integrity like teachers, scientists, or community leaders who contribute positively without seeking the spotlight.

Solution:

Society must shift the focus from glamour to genuine impact. Students should be encouraged to follow people who show moral strength, kindness, and hard work in their daily lives.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, celebrities may be entertaining, but that doesn’t automatically make them role models. We must be careful about whom we admire and why.

Do's and Don'ts in Debate Writing

✅ Do's

Start with a Formal Greeting

Begin your debate with a proper salutation:

"Respected Chairperson, Honorable Judges, and My Dear Friends…"

Stick to Your Side

Whether you are speaking for or against the motion, stay consistent with your stance throughout the debate.

Use Clear and Logical Arguments

Each point should be easy to understand and supported with facts, examples, or real-life references.

Structure Your Content

Organize your speech into four parts:

Introduction

Body (arguments)

Solutions or suggestions

Conclusion

Use Persuasive Language

Use strong, confident words and phrases that show conviction in your argument.

Address the Opposition Thoughtfully

Mention common points from the opposing side and politely counter them with logic and reasoning.

Practice Good Grammar and Vocabulary

Use formal language, correct sentence structure, and powerful vocabulary to make your argument sound credible.

Conclude Effectively

End your debate with a strong statement that reinforces your stand. Use a phrase like "In conclusion, I strongly believe..."

❌ Don'ts

Don’t Be Rude or Disrespectful

Never attack the opposing speaker personally. Debate is about arguments, not individuals.

Don’t Go Off-Topic

Stay focused on the motion. Irrelevant points weaken your overall argument.

Don’t Use Informal or Slang Language

Avoid casual words like “cool,” “stuff,” or text abbreviations. Debate writing is formal.

Don’t Repeat the Same Point

Avoid saying the same argument in different words. Bring in variety and depth to your reasoning.

Don’t Make Claims Without Support

Every point should be backed by logic, facts, statistics, or real examples.

Don’t Use Emotional Appeals Alone

While emotions can make your speech powerful, don't rely only on them. Combine them with solid reasoning.

Don’t Forget the Audience

Keep your speech engaging and relevant for your listeners. Speak clearly and confidently.

Don’t Ignore Time Limits

In timed debates, manage your time well. Don’t rush or spend too long on one point.

How PlanetSpark Helps You Excel in Debate Writing

At PlanetSpark, we go beyond just teaching the theory of debate writing. We help students live the debate experience. Our debate classes are designed to build strong communication skills, boost confidence, and develop the ability to think critically under pressure.

Here’s how we help Class 11 students excel in debates:

1. Live, Interactive Sessions:

Our expert mentors conduct engaging live classes where students practice debating on real-world topics. This helps them improve articulation, spontaneity, and persuasive speaking.

2. Structured Curriculum Aligned with CBSE:

We follow a debate format that mirrors the CBSE guidelines, helping students master the expected structure, tone, and content. From writing impactful openings to delivering convincing conclusions, we cover it all.

3. Focus on Delivery and Confidence:

Students not only learn to write debates but also present them confidently in front of an audience. This dual focus on writing and speaking sets them apart in class and beyond.

4. Personalized Feedback and Growth Tracking:

Every student receives individual feedback on their arguments, delivery, grammar, and overall presentation. We track their growth over time, ensuring consistent improvement.

5. Regular Mock Debates and Competitions:

Practice makes perfect! PlanetSpark hosts regular mock debates and inter-student competitions to simulate real-life debate environments and boost performance.

The result?

Students become confident speakers, logical thinkers, and skilled debaters ready to impress in exams, interviews, and public forums.

👉 Give your child the PlanetSpark advantage. Book a free trial class today and watch them grow into a powerful communicator!

Marking Scheme for Debate Writing in Class 11 (CBSE)

• Debate writing in Class 11 is usually assessed out of 10 marks. Here's how the marks are typically distributed:

• Content (4 marks): This includes how relevant, clear, and well-structured your arguments are. Make sure your points are logical, backed with examples, and aligned with your stance.

• Fluency and Coherence (2 marks): Your ideas should flow smoothly from one to the next. Use proper transitions and ensure your arguments are logically connected.

• Grammar and Vocabulary (2 marks): Use correct sentence structures, punctuation, and a range of vocabulary. Avoid grammatical errors to secure full marks here.

• Format (1 mark): Follow the proper format of a debate. Include a title, greet the audience, introduce yourself as the speaker, and clearly mention whether you are speaking for or against the motion.

• Word Limit Adherence (1 mark): Stick to the prescribed word count (usually around 150–200 words). Writing too little or too much can lead to marks being deducted.

FAQs on Debate Writing Class 11

Q1. What is the ideal word count for a Class 11 debate?

A: 150–200 words, as per CBSE rules.

Q2. Can I use casual language in a debate?

A: No. Use a formal and persuasive tone.

Q3. Should I add statistics?

A: Yes. Facts make your points stronger.

Q4. How is debate writing different from speech writing?

A: Debates include both support and rebuttal. Speeches don’t.

Conclusion

Debate writing in Class 11 is more than just a school task. It builds logic, clarity, and confidence. These are skills that help in exams, college, and beyond.

Want your child to shine in debates and life? Book a free trial class with PlanetSpark today and start their journey to confident communication!