The Interview summary: Q&A, Theme, and Analysis for Class 12

The Interview Summary from the Class 12 English Flamingo book explores how interviews have become a vital part of modern communication. Written by Christopher Silvester, it discusses the mixed opinions people have about interviews, some see them as an art and a source of truth, while others feel they invade privacy. The chapter also includes an engaging interview between Mukund Padmanabhan and Umberto Eco, offering insights into Eco’s ideas, creativity, and views on writing and knowledge.

In this blog, we will summarize the key points of the chapter, explore the perspectives shared by Silvester and Eco, and highlight the important lessons students can learn about communication and expression.

The Interview Summary - Class 12 NCERT

Part I – The Nature, History, and Perception of Interviews

The Interview Summary begins with a discussion on the evolution of interviews as a journalistic tool. Invented over 130 years ago, interviews have become an essential part of modern media. Almost everyone who reads newspapers, magazines, or online platforms will encounter interviews, while thousands of public figures, celebrities, writers, and leaders have been interviewed repeatedly over the years.

Silvester explains that interviews serve multiple functions and are viewed differently by different people:

1. Interviews as a Source of Truth and Art

   • Some journalists and thinkers consider interviews a form of art, capable of revealing truth and offering insight into personalities, ideas, and events.

   • A well-conducted interview can capture the thoughts, emotions, and experiences of a person in a way that essays or reports cannot.

   • Interviews are therefore a powerful medium for learning about society, culture, and human behavior.

2. Interviews as an Intrusion

   • Many celebrities view interviews as intrusive and unwelcome. Silvester provides several examples:

     • V. S. Naipaul believed interviews could harm people, making them lose a part of themselves.

     • Lewis Carroll refused to be interviewed because he feared being lionized or excessively admired, which he felt could distort his true self.

     • Rudyard Kipling considered interviews immoral, even comparing them to an assault on his person, although he had previously interviewed others.

     • H. G. Wells described interviews as an “ordeal” but still participated actively and even interviewed Joseph Stalin later in life.

     • Saul Bellow, despite agreeing to interviews, described them metaphorically as thumbprints on his windpipe, showing the discomfort some intellectuals feel.

3. The Role of Interviews Today

   • Despite some negative perceptions, interviews are indispensable. Denis Brian, a journalist, notes that our most vivid impressions of contemporaries come from interviews.

   • Interviews allow one person to ask questions and reveal ideas, experiences, and opinions, creating a bridge between knowledge and audience.

   • The interviewer thus holds significant power and influence, making this medium both responsible and impactful.

In essence, Part I of the chapter highlights the dual nature of interviews, they are both enlightening and potentially intrusive, yet they remain central to understanding individuals and society.

Sign up for a demo to experience 1:1 guidance on answering questions clearly and effectively, just like in the interviews discussed in The Interview Summary.

Part II – Interview with Umberto Eco

The second part of The Interview Summary focuses on a detailed conversation between Mukund Padmanabhan of The Hindu and the Italian scholar and novelist Umberto Eco. Eco, a professor at the University of Bologna, was already a recognized academic in semiotics, medieval studies, and literary theory before the worldwide success of his novel The Name of the Rose.

The interview offers a mix of personal insights, professional philosophy, and reflections on creativity, and can be summarized as follows:

1. One Central Pursuit Through Many Works

   • Eco explains that although he appears to engage in multiple activities, writing novels, essays, children’s books, and scholarly articles, he is essentially pursuing the same ethical and philosophical interests.

   • His work, whether academic or fictional, reflects a consistent focus on morality, philosophy, and human understanding.

2. The Concept of Interstices

   • Eco introduces the idea of interstices, or “empty spaces” in life.

   • These small moments, like waiting for an elevator, are used productively. Eco shares that he often writes or thinks creatively during such moments.

   • This concept emphasizes the importance of time management, focus, and using small pockets of time effectively, lessons that students can apply in their studies.

3. Narrative Style in Academic Work

   • Unlike conventional, impersonal academic writing, Eco prefers telling the story of his research, including mistakes, trials, and insights.

   • This narrative approach makes his academic work engaging and accessible, demonstrating that learning can be both rigorous and enjoyable.

   • This philosophy later influenced his fiction writing, which he began at the age of 50.

4. Identity and Profession

   • Eco considers himself primarily a university professor who writes novels on Sundays, highlighting that his identity is rooted in academia rather than literary fame.

   • He enjoys being part of the academic community and values scholarly conferences over literary clubs.

   • Yet, he acknowledges that writing novels allows him to reach a wider audience, something scholarly work alone cannot achieve.

5. Success of The Name of the Rose

   • Eco reflects on the unexpected success of his novel, which combines detective storytelling with theology, medieval history, and philosophy.

   • The novel sold millions of copies worldwide, surpassing initial expectations, especially in countries unfamiliar with medieval culture or Latin.

   • Eco notes that success is unpredictable and timing plays a crucial role: had he published the novel ten years earlier or later, its impact might have been very different.

   • This demonstrates that while skill and creativity are essential, circumstances and audience reception also shape success.

6. Balancing Depth and Accessibility

   • Eco shows that one can write complex, intellectually rich works while still engaging a wide audience.

   • He contrasts this with his own casual entertainment choices, like watching television after dinner, emphasizing that people enjoy variety in learning and leisure.

Insights and Lessons from The Interview Summary

1. Interviews are a powerful medium for sharing ideas, thoughts, and personalities.

2. They can be both artful and intrusive, depending on the perspective of the interviewer and interviewee.

3. Eco’s approach teaches students to integrate creativity with discipline, using small moments productively.

4. Writing and communication can be narrative-driven, even in academic or formal contexts.

5. Success often depends on timing, audience, and the ability to balance depth with accessibility.

6. Understanding the philosophy behind work helps connect different areas of knowledge, as Eco demonstrates with fiction, essays, and academic texts.

The Interview Summary - Understanding the Text

1. Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give reasons for your opinion.
   
   Yes, Umberto Eco seems comfortable with interviews. Unlike many intellectuals who view interviews as intrusive, Eco uses them as an opportunity to share his ideas, explain his philosophy, and discuss his work thoughtfully. In his conversation with Mukund Padmanabhan, he speaks openly about his academic and literary life, showing that he sees interviews as a meaningful medium rather than a burden.

2. How does Eco find the time to write so much?
   Eco is highly disciplined and productive. He uses small pockets of time, which he calls “interstices”, efficiently—for example, writing while waiting for an elevator. He integrates writing into his daily routine and focuses on tasks that reflect his ongoing ethical and philosophical interests, which allows him to produce a vast range of work across fiction, essays, and academic studies.

3. What was distinctive about Eco’s academic writing style?
   Eco’s academic writing is narrative-driven and engaging, unlike traditional scholarly texts that are often dry and impersonal. He tells the story of his research, including trials, errors, and insights, making complex ideas accessible and interesting. This approach also influenced his fiction writing, as he naturally blends storytelling with intellectual depth.

4. Did Umberto Eco consider himself a novelist first or an academic scholar?
   Eco considered himself primarily an academic scholar, a professor who writes novels “on Sundays.” He identified strongly with the academic community, attending conferences and participating in scholarly discussions. Novels, for him, were a way to reach a wider audience but did not define his professional identity.

5. What is the reason for the huge success of the novel, The Name of the Rose?
   The success of The Name of the Rose is multi-faceted and somewhat unpredictable. The novel combines detective fiction with theology, medieval history, and philosophy, appealing to both casual readers and serious intellectuals. Eco notes that timing and audience play a major role, publishing it at the right time allowed it to resonate with readers worldwide. He also emphasizes that success is partly a mystery and cannot always be predicted by the content alone.

The Interview Summary - Talking About the Text

1. Sharing an Interview You Have Watched or Read
   Think about any interview you have watched on television, listened to on radio, or read in a newspaper or magazine. Discuss how it helped you understand:

   • The Celebrity: Their personality, beliefs, or way of thinking beyond what you see in movies, sports, or social media.

   • The Interviewer: How they ask questions, guide the conversation, and uncover interesting insights.

   • The Field of the Celebrity: You may gain knowledge about acting, sports, politics, science, or other areas through the discussion.
     For example, a television interview with a famous scientist might make you appreciate their dedication, while also showing how reporters bring out complex ideas in simple words.

2. Preferred Medium for an Interview
   Students can discuss which medium they like best:

   • Print: Allows careful reading, reflection, and revisiting key points.

   • Radio: Focuses on tone of voice and dialogue, which can feel personal.

   • Television: Combines visual cues, expressions, and gestures, giving a fuller impression of the person.
     Each medium has its advantages, and preferences may vary depending on whether you want detail, emotion, or visual context.

3. Privacy of Celebrities and Interview Ethics
   Every famous person has a right to privacy. Interviewers must respect this while asking questions. Sometimes, personal questions may embarrass celebrities or make them uncomfortable. Students can discuss ways interviewers can balance curiosity with respect, such as:

   • Focusing on professional achievements instead of private life.

   • Asking personal questions politely and giving the interviewee the option to decline.

   • Understanding that interviews are a tool for communication, not for intrusion.

From Class 12 to Confident Speakers!
Book a free demo and see how PlanetSpark builds communication skills that go beyond textbooks.

Key Takeaways from The Interview Summary

• Interviews are a powerful tool for communication, allowing one person to ask questions and another to share ideas, thoughts, and experiences.

• Some people see interviews as an art form and a source of truth, while others view them as intrusive or uncomfortable, especially if personal questions are asked.

• Over 130 years, interviews have evolved into a common journalistic practice. Famous personalities like Lewis Carroll, Rudyard Kipling, H.G. Wells, and Saul Bellow had varied reactions to being interviewed, reflecting the mixed perceptions of the medium.

• Umberto Eco integrates his philosophical and ethical interests across all his work, novels, essays, and academic writing. He uses small pockets of time (interstices) effectively to write and think creatively. His academic style is narrative-driven, including trials and errors, making learning more engaging.

• Eco considers himself primarily a professor, while novels allow him to reach a wider audience. This teaches students the importance of balancing professional identity with public engagement.

• The success of The Name of the Rose was unexpected and shows that timing, audience, and the appeal of content are crucial. Success is not always predictable but comes from quality work and persistence.

• Celebrities have a right to privacy, and interviewers should ask questions respectfully, focusing on insights rather than intrusion.

• Interviews teach students how to communicate effectively, ask meaningful questions, and understand people deeply, which is useful for academics, careers, and life.

About the Author

Christopher Silvester, born in 1959, studied history at Peterhouse, Cambridge. He worked as a reporter for Private Eye for ten years and has written features for Vanity Fair. The excerpt in The Interview is taken from his introduction to The Penguin Book of Interviews: An Anthology from 1859 to the Present Day.

Theme

The Interview Summary explores several important themes:

1. The Art and Power of Interviews – Interviews are more than simple question-and-answer sessions; they are a medium to reveal thoughts, ideas, and personalities. They influence public perception and serve as a bridge between knowledge and the audience.

2. Communication and Expression – Effective communication is central to interviews. The chapter emphasizes how asking the right questions and expressing ideas clearly helps convey deeper understanding.

3. Balancing Public and Private Life – Many public figures struggle with maintaining privacy while engaging with the media. The text highlights the ethical responsibility of interviewers to respect personal boundaries.

4. Creativity and Discipline – Through Umberto Eco’s interview, the chapter shows how combining structured academic work with creative pursuits leads to meaningful output.

5. Unpredictability of Success – The success of creative work, like Eco’s The Name of the Rose, depends on timing, audience, and effort, showing that excellence doesn’t always guarantee predictable results.

How PlanetSpark Helps Students Improve Communication

The Interview Summary teaches important lessons about asking questions, expressing ideas clearly, and understanding people, skills that are essential for effective communication. PlanetSpark offers tools and programs to help students develop these abilities:

• 1:1 Personal Trainers – Students get personalized guidance on speaking confidently and structuring their thoughts.

• SparkX AI Video Analysis – Helps learners identify areas to improve in pronunciation, clarity, and body language.

• Public Speaking and Interview Practice – Students can simulate interviews and practice answering questions like journalists, improving both confidence and content delivery.

• AI-Led Feedback – Instant, constructive feedback ensures students learn faster and build strong communication habits.

By combining these features, PlanetSpark helps students express themselves clearly, think critically, and communicate effectively, just like the personalities and interviewees discussed in The Interview.

Conclusion - The Interview Summary  

The Interview Summary provides students with a comprehensive understanding of interviews as a journalistic and communicative tool. It highlights the art, challenges, and ethics of interviewing, showing how it can reveal deep insights about individuals and their work. Through Umberto Eco’s interview, students learn the importance of creativity, discipline, and time management, as well as balancing professional identity with public engagement.

By studying this chapter, Class 12 students can not only enhance comprehension skills but also develop an appreciation for effective communication, critical thinking, and respectful interaction, skills that are useful in academics, interviews, and everyday life.

FAQs - The Interview Summary 

1. What is the main focus of The Interview?
The chapter explores the significance, challenges, and impact of interviews in journalism and communication, along with a detailed conversation with Umberto Eco.

2. Who is Umberto Eco, and why is he important in this chapter?
Umberto Eco was an Italian scholar, academic, and novelist. His interview illustrates how intellectuals communicate ideas and balance academic work with creative writing.

3. How do interviews influence public perception?
Interviews shape how audiences understand personalities, ideas, and events. They reveal both personal and professional aspects of the interviewee.

4. What lesson does Eco’s interview teach about time management?
Eco shows how to use small moments, or “interstices,” productively, emphasizing efficiency, focus, and integrating work into daily life.

5. Why was The Name of the Rose so successful?
The novel’s success was due to a combination of its intellectual depth, storytelling, timing, and audience engagement, though Eco notes that success is often unpredictable.